End X Xenophobia Now!

End X Xenophobia Now!

End X Xenophobia Now!

Millions of X users worldwide are cruising this social media giant’s algorithmic highways and byways while in the grip of an abject fear of what they don’t understand.  And there’s an excellent chance that they don’t even realize it.  Keep it right here for an eye-opening look at the problem, and for some extremely sound advice on how to end X xenophobia now.

By John G. Stamos

Forget all about X’s censorship issues.  All those political silencing allegations and actualities gnawing away at the bulwark of the great platform’s integrity from within and from without.  Yeah, that stuff.  Forget it.  It’s trivial crap.  It’s harmless compared to what’s happening on X at the grassroots level… at the individual user level.  Why am I sounding this particular alarm?  What’s happening to Xers that’s got my knickers all in a twist?  Am I actually the scaremonger here?

I’ll answer the last question first.  No.  I’m not trying to frighten anyone.  I’m simply calling attention to the fact that we, as X account holders and routine users, are being subjected to an insidious form of social media social engineering that’s using a combination of some slick algorithmic hocus pocus and a particular subset of universal, innate human behaviors against us – namely our inclination toward self-absorption, our generalized tunnel-visioned appraisal of sensory and intellectual data, our gullibility, and our unconscious tendency to cluster in cattle-like herds (just ask Nietzche and see if I’m wrong about that last one).

The upshot of this little briefing is the answer to the first two questions: X is subtly mesmerizing and terrifying its users while wrangling us into delineated, quaking, xenophobic colonies. 

Listen up, Xers, you can thank your lucky stars that yours truly has maintained the necessary self-possession to tear free from X’s hypnotic thrall long enough to log these observations.  And trust me when I tell you that you’re going to thank me later for coming up with the following game plan that’s guaranteed to break the chains of fear with which X has shackled you (and which, up to this point, you never even knew existed).  It’s time to end X xenophobia now, and it starts with you.  Everything you need to know is laid out right here in three simple steps.

Step One: Fix Your X Bio

The obsequious X bio is where the platform’s plague of xenophobia sets down its sinister roots.  Telling your new and future pals on X a little bit about yourself seems innocuous enough.  But don’t be fooled.  One false step on your part, and the next thing you know, you’re a xenophobia germ carrier.

Common nouns are polarizing no-nos.  When you describe yourself in your bio, you’ve got to be exceedingly careful about how you do it.  If you’re not, you could end up attracting only a certain kind of user – the kind that identifies only with what you’re all about as defined by your own X bio.  The kind that’s afraid of everything that’s not him or her or you.  The kind that’s a xenophobe.  People who are terrified by anything beyond that with which they’re familiar – xenophobes – are galvanized into X following/liking/fearing/blocking frenzies by common nouns.  They’re comfortable with common nouns with which they can identify, and scared shitless by those with which they can’t.  (Even the word “xenophobe” is a common noun.)  If it’s a common noun to which they can relate, xenophobes are going to be comfortable with it and cozy up to it.  If you tell people on X that you’re a “gardener,” for example, you’re only going to get scaredy cats who identify with that word as your followers.  People unfamiliar with this intimidating common noun and all that it could potentially imply aren’t going to give you the time of day.  And likewise, people who identify on X as “gardeners” are going to be terrified of anyone who uses a common noun other than “gardener” to describe themselves in their X bio – they simply won’t follow them, or be at all interested in anything they have to say.  The same goes for using the common noun “writer” as a description of what you’re all about.  The chicken-shits on X who believe that they’re “writers” will flock to you (and to others who utilize the same common noun in their X bios), but anybody who doesn’t identify as a “writer” won’t.  And those same chicken-shit “writers” aren’t going to identify with, or be at all interested in anyone who’s not another chicken-shit “writer,” as defined by his or her X bio.  Here’s another one: “doctor.”  Who the hell is gonna follow you besides other “doctors” (or maybe someone sucking up to you for a free diagnosis) if you describe yourself in your X bio as a “doctor?”  See what I mean?  What about “poet?”  Check.  “plumber?”  Yep.  “astrophysicist?”  For sure.  It’s all about the common nouns.  They’re X’s hammer and nails in its construction of your personal cage of fear.  Ok.  So far, so good.  But now that you’re getting the picture and understanding how using common nouns in your X bio is fomenting more X xenophobia, you’re probably asking yourself, “Since common nouns are off limits, how can I describe myself in my X bio without spreading more xenophobia?”  The answer is simple:

Use predicates to describe yourself in your X bio.  In my own X bio, I describe myself using predicates.  Even though I do indeed write for a living and could effectively be considered a “writer,” I simply use a predicate in my X bio to introduce myself: “Write stuff.”  I think that by introducing myself in this way (rather than with the fear-inducing common noun, “writer”), I might actually meet more people that I’d like to hang out with and get to know, and who might like to hang out with and get to know me in return.  They might say to themselves, “Hey, even though I really dig vintage German porn and heavy drinking, and I don’t really consider myself a writer, it doesn’t mean that I don’t like to scribble my own thoughts down on a bar napkin every once in a while, too.  It might be cool hanging with this guy who says he also likes to do that.  And who knows?  Maybe he likes getting completely shitfaced every single day of the week, or watching an 8mm reel of Ilsa getting screwed by a Barbary ape, just like I do.”  So you see, without any frightening common nouns around to put up xenophobic barriers, the liking and following situation becomes totally chill.  And the same goes for other professions, too.  Rather than being curious about and maybe following a “doctor,” a typical, non-medically-trained X user might be more inclined to want to get to know someone who instead says that they “open peoples’ craniums and surgically excise glioblastomas,” or “palpate and express sebaceous cysts until they’re depleted of their contents,” or “treat genital warts.”  That same non-doctor X user could then very well say to himself/herself, “Hey, I might be a diesel mechanic by trade, but I think I’d really love digging around in somebody’s skull with a pair of pliers and a box cutter some time, looking to maybe eliminate an unwelcome growth or two.  Or maybe taking a crack at squeezing the pus out of a big, ripe whelk blooming on some some guy’s forehead.  And if I end up never getting to do any of these amazing things myself, it’d be cool to hang out with somebody who actually does get to do it.”  See?  Totally chill.  So, remember:  No common nouns in your bio!  Use predicates instead.  They’re way friendlier and way more inviting.  If everyone used predicates to describe themselves in their bios, xenophobia would be eliminated from X quicker than you can say that you like to “criminally prosecute accused serial killers.”

Step Two: Cool It with the Hashtags

Using hashtags in your X bio or posts accomplishes virtually the same thing as using common nouns: It whips each of your fellow X users into a dehumanizing frenzy of fear and reduces him or her to an unrecognizable assemblage of defective polypeptide chains, festooned within strands of formerly-human DNA, left mewling and quaking in a pair of pee-soaked skivvies.  Here’s a little Q&A session to help explain why hashtags are just as effective as common nouns at breeding xenophobia on X:

Q: I like to take pictures of my ’92 Chrysler’s steering system tie rods and post them on X with clever comments about them for #tierodtuesday.  By using the “#tierodtuesday” hashtag in my post, will I reach a broader range of users and maybe get more followers?

A: If this question were any more intelligent, it would qualify as stupid.  I’ll answer it with a question of my own: Did your mother drop a Chrysler’s steering system tie rod on your head when you were an infant?  Best of luck!

…………………….

Q: I’m a #writer who is trying desperately to market and sell my new, self-published novel, a rom-com titled Falling for Kirsten, on X.  I routinely share it in posts with the “#writingcommunity” hashtag featured prominently, where I know other #writers can surely see it, but I’m not realizing any book sales.  Am I creating a xenophobic situation for myself by including this hashtag in my posts?

A: Your question requires a multi-pronged answer.  I’ll start by saying that the next book that shows up in my feed with a gerund in its title is going to find itself shoved down its author’s throat.  Also, since hashtags are evidently an integral and irresistable part of your standard method of communication on the X platform, you might try including #actuallybuyingsomethingcommunity in your posts instead of #writingcommunity.  Finally, I’m guessing that in addition to being a #writer, you’re a #moron.  Hope this helps!

…………………….

Q: Does the use of hash tags make people fearful of things with which they’re unfamiliar?

A: Does Kermit the Frog’s pecker smell like pork?  You’re damned right, it does.  If you attach something like #crackwhore to your bio, how many people with #sundayschoolteacher or #kidsfirst in their bios are gonna have the balls to follow you?  Wake up, goddamn it.  Happy posting!

…………………….

Q: I’ve finally taken your advice and purged my X bio of hashtags.  I’ve also stopped using hashtags in all of my posts.  I’ve included a screenshot of my X profile, which includes my profile photo and my new, hashtag-free bio.  Assuming it all looks good to you, do you think I can expect an increase in the number of people who follow me here on X, and ultimately, a broader, more diverse range of followers?

A: Shit. With that hairstyle?  Are you serious?.

Step Three: No Flower Photos!!!

Never, ever post pictures of flowers on X, and don’t even think about including flowers in your X profile.  Doing so will result in a radiating seismic xenophobic wave of unprecedented magnitude, with you and your flower pics at its epicenter.

Studies show that viewing a photo of a pretty flower after it’s been massaged and re-pixelated by the Oz-like code-snipping wizardry of X the Great and Terrible  – even if only for a very brief instant – wreaks cataclysmic physiological damage within the human brain, with profound attendant psychosociological transformations observed in human test subjects.  Basically, in an adult human being, admiring X-reconstituted flower photos causes an acute and instantaneous reversion to an early childhood state where reading skills are nonexistent and a heightened level of fear of the unfamiliar is manifested.

If you stick a flower photo in your X bio, or if your particular X post includes a shot of a flower, or, worse, flowers, the effects on anyone who sees these images will be immediately evident.  The subject will essentially enter what presents as a catatonic state in which penetration to the cerebral cortex by any outside stimuli beyond the flower pic abruptly ceases.  In this state, the subject will be incapable of any rational thought or cognition beyond the most rudimentary comprehension of the flower pic’s existence.  Will the subject read any caption that accompanies the flower photo that you’ve provided?  Absolutely not.  This is evidenced by frequent replies of “What kind of flower is that?” to the flower photos I myself have posted, despite the fact that these photos include captioned identifications.  Here, it’s important to note that said captioned identifications come in the form of clearly visible written words, which the subject is incapable of reading due to the damaging cognitive effects wrought by the presence of the odious flower photo itself.

If those who are enthralled/impaired by the image of a pretty flower are likewise incapable of reading a legible caption that’s clearly positioned in immediate proximity to the photo itself, what are the chances that they’ll read an entirely separate post?  Specifically, a post that doesn’t include a flower photo, or anything at all related to gardens or plants?  The answer: Zero.  My own research has shown that when a particular X user views one of my posts that includes a flower(s), he or she will demonstrate not the slightest interest in, or acknowledgement of, any content that I might include that is not flower-related.  For instance, in my own X feed, if I include a link to a particular piece I’ve written, although it may immediately precede or succeed my post featuring the flower photo, it will be the flower photo post to which all of the interest accrues.  The non-flower post receives no attention from the very X users who were only seconds before (or seconds later) engaged by the flower post.  I attribute this result to the X-transmogrified flower pic’s ability to render any and all who look upon it incapable of reading, and terrified by any and all things non-floral.  Hence, flower photos, and their posting by X users, are among the predominant root causes of xenophobia on the X social media platform.

A note of caution: The use of #gardening, #gardens, #flowers, and any and all associated hashtags bring about the same devastating effects in X users as viewing flower photos.   

In Conclusion

In a nutshell, it can be argued that the X platform’s ostensibly prosaic individual user features and defining parameters are quietly being used to segregate users and divide them into unwitting, xenophobic units.  But you, the wary and wise user, can combat this algorithmic malevolence by remembering the three steps outlined in this article.  Fix your X bio by eliminating common nouns and using predicates instead to tell your new friends all about yourself.  Common nouns, though ubiquitous, are scary and off-putting, but predicates are warm and inviting.  Don’t use hashtags.  As outlined above, they suck.  Finally, NEVER feature a photo of a flower or flowers in your X profile or posts.  In exactly the same way that the seeds their real life counterparts produce, the seeds of xenophobia produced by X-mutated flower photos spread incredibly far on the X platform, and they spread incredibly, and dangerously, wide.

If you remember these three steps, and incorporate their tenets in your own X activities, you’ll enjoy the benefits of engaging with a diverse and fascinating group of friends with wide-ranging intersts and vocations.  Fail to remember the steps and you’ll be at extreme risk of toppling into the black abyss of X xenophobia.

Cheers, and Happy Gardening!     

The Renaissance Garden Guy is a participant in the Amazon Associates Program.  As an Amazon Associate, The Renaissance Garden Guy earns from qualifying purchases.

Additionally, The Renaissance Garden Guy is a participant in the Bluehost, SeedsNow, and hosting.com (formerly A2 Hosting) affiliate programs.  The Renaissance Garden Guy earns a fee/commission each time a visitor clicks on an ad or banner in this site from one of these companies and makes a subsequent qualifying purchase.

Please click here to view The Renaissance Garden Guy Disclosure page.

25 thoughts on “End X Xenophobia Now!”

  1. Liberate yourself!!!!

    Free yourself from the ex [or X]

    Remember the blue bird flew away – nevermore to be seen again

    Except in the ‘Blue Sky’ – which is where many of the former ‘blue birds’ have landed.

    Become one with the Blue Sky.

    It’s a much nicer place.

  2. Very interesting and very funny! And I do love flowers 🌺🌸🌺 On my part I enjoy X —- A lot of technology discoveries, and I am an addict 😊 It depends what we are looking for —- 🌺😊

    1. Thank you for reading the piece, Roxxy, and thank you for your kind words. You are correct. X is a massive arena where millions of people, all with their own interests, passions, and pursuits, can mix and mingle. It’s fostered a lovely social media community. Thanks once again, Roxxy. I really do appreciate it.

    1. I think X is still pretty groovy, but I really do miss that bird…
      Thanks for reading and commenting, Annie – I really appreciate it.

  3. Enjoyed reading this, John. I thought I was ‘too scattered’ in my bio, by NOT focusing on a specific thing. 😆 It’s all a mystery on X to me, I have no idea what I’m doing so thanks for shedding some light!

    1. Thank you for reading my little farce, Diane. I really appreciate it. And, in my opinion, your X bio is lovely. You’re doing great, and you’re a wonderful person. These facts are very evident. I do, however, have one piece of advice to offer you: definitely DO NOT do any of the things I babbled about in this piece! Thank you once again, Diane!

  4. Or worse, maybe there’s a day you don’t post a pic of a flower on X and I miss out on getting my catatonic fix. What then? Am I actually expected to exist in a non-catatonic state?

    No way, man. Too much responsibility. I’m going back to Royal Match and randomly blowing up stuff.

    1. Whoah. Randomly blowing up stuff? Now that’s some serious next-level nirvana. Semper fi, baby. Cheers, Austin – thanks for giving it a read.

  5. 🤭No X for me…the OG, Facebook, is the only “one” I play with. I’d be lying if I said I didn’t sometimes scroll mindlessly through and pause at photos that catch my eye. I promise to read before I ask questions.🤣 Your writing is spectacular, John! Don’t fear the scrollers. I’ve read they’re not as contagious as was once reported.

    1. Thank you so much, Tina, for the kind words and for reading the piece. I’m hoping against hope that the minds behind Meta/Facebook never get their hands on X’s fearsome mind-numbing technology. The implications for humanity would be disastrous! Thanks once again, Tina. I really appreciate it!

  6. I caught myself laughing out loud! Great article, I’m glad I’m not on X/Twitter. If a picture of flowers puts the average reader in a catatonic state, I can only imagine what a puppy or kitten photo would do!

    1. Thanks for reading it, Kevin. I’m glad you could see the humor in the situation. Of course, I’m exaggerating. But not by much! Thanks again for reading the piece, Kevin, and for commenting here. I really appreciate it.

    1. Thanks for reading it, Rick – I’m glad to hear you enjoyed it. It was a lot of fun lampooning X and the general behavior of so many of us X account holders. It was all in good fun. Thanks once again for reading it, Rick, and for commenting here. I really appreciate it!

  7. This is massively #funny stuff, John. Already considering updating my bio to “digs nature things” – well done, sir!

  8. Interesting article John!
    Best to be mindful of these you spoke about!

    Can’t imagine in 5 yrs where we will be with Ai dominating everything!

    -Waz

    1. This one was all in good fun, Waz. I really appreciate your reading it and commenting here. You bring up an excellent point: AI is distorting the landscape for all of the creative arts, and it’s blurring the lines between actual human creativity and algorithmic, code-based, output generation. I’m proud to say that there’s no place for AI in any of my own creative endeavors. Once again, Waz, I thank you for reading this one, and for your kind and thought-provoking comments.

    1. Thank you for reading it and commenting, Loretta. X is a dangerous place for the unwary! Thanks again – I really appreciate it.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

You cannot copy the content of this page.